More than four months after President Joe Biden declared the pandemic to be over, the White House is fighting efforts to lift lingering and nonsensical COVID rules.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit concludes the President exceeded the scope of his delegated authority.
College students should be able to use their own judgment on COVID boosters, not be forced into them by learning institutions.
From the sounds of it, the Air Force's attorneys didn't think too carefully about how to respond to Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) claims.
The president has urged the Chinese government to respect the rights of anti-lockdown demonstrators. He actively encouraged the Canadian government to end the trucker protests.
Plus: ACLU in court over law criminalizing school behavior, Twitter losing heavy users, and more...
Blue states may require the vaccine after the CDC recommends it, stripping families of a choice that should be theirs.
Why should low-income children be the only ones still forced to wear masks?
We’re likely to be poorer, distrustful, and less free for years to come.
Gov. Jay Inslee says Washington state's COVID-19 emergency will finally come to an end on October 31.
Mayor Muriel Bowser and the D.C. Council will force all public school students ages 12 and up to be vaccinated against COVID-19.
I am one of the relatively few people who think the Court got both cases right.
For trips shorter than six days, vaccinated passengers will no longer need to obtain a negative test result before boarding.
Revived mandates remind everyone that governments have done far more harm than good in the pandemic.
If the rules don't apply to everyone, they ought not apply to anyone.
The city's private employer vaccine mandate is not just an overreaching policy; it's now a completely nonsensical and ineffective one.
Disagreement over pandemic policy accelerates the slide toward authoritarianism in another country.
Mocking COVID public health theater is finally going mainstream.
There’s no freedom if the state can separate us from our money.
In an age of elite scorn, government mandates, a rotten economy—and powerful, decentralized communication tools—common people are pushing back.
Apparently the rule of law doesn’t matter if Justin Trudeau doesn’t like your peaceful protest.
Our gentle neighbor to the North rushes toward grim authoritarianism.
Did Justin Trudeau accidentally prove crypto bros' point?
Seven out of 10 Americans say "it's time we accept COVID is here to stay and we just need to get on with our lives." Politicians are taking notice.
Plus, the editors' takes on the Super Bowl.
"The District’s indoor mask requirements will be dialed back on March 1, 2022," said Bowser.
What Joe Rogan and Canadian truckers tell us about free speech.
Los Angeles Libertarians to start gathering signatures to overturn the four-month-old ordinance.
Plus: National debt tops $30 trilion, Whoopi Goldberg suspended over Holocaust comments, and more...
"My servers are not lesser people," said owner Eric Flannery. "They don't need to be masked. They don't carry disease."
"Obviously we could have used the money, but at what cost?,” says Sheila Hemphill, an activist and lobbyist from Brady, Texas
The students' negative COVID tests weren't good enough for school administrators.
The Big Board on H Street continues to insist that "all are welcome."
That process takes a long time, and the result would face the same legal objection cited by the Supreme Court.
SCOTUS rejected attempt to bypass Congress with an emergency regulation.
Politicians evade responsibility when they make civilians enforce mask and vaccine mandates.
School choice is the best alternative for parents who are reasonably frustrated with this insanity.
Insofar as the Court was concerned about pretext, it may be more difficult for the EPA to reduce greenhouse gases using regulatory authority to control emissions.
You don't have to be anti-vaccine to oppose these ever-expanding requirements.
How to make a terrible case for a good cause
The question for the Supreme Court was not whether the policy was wise but whether it was legal.
The crux of the argument is the distinction "between occupational risk and risk more generally."