Rep. Adam Schiff Seeks Dianne Feinstein's Senate Seat
They both share in their authoritarian desires to censor online speech and violate citizen privacy.
They both share in their authoritarian desires to censor online speech and violate citizen privacy.
Philadelphia's progressive district attorney tried to enact criminal justice reform—and got impeached for his trouble.
The final report from the January 6 select committee falls short of proving the elements required to convict the former president.
Twenty-five people have died this month amid nationwide protests.
New article in symposium on the law and politics of impeachment now available
The proposals were agreed on by members of the conservative, libertarian, and progressive teams participating in the NCC's earlier constitution drafting project.
Starr's role in the impeachment of Clinton may have cost him a seat on the Supreme Court. And the biggest beneficiary of Starr's failure was probably George W. Bush.
Michigan's 3rd district has produced two consecutive freedom-oriented Republican lawmakers. Tuesday's results ensure that there won't be a third.
A year and a half after the New York Post broke the story, the Times says it has "authenticated" the messages it previously deemed suspect.
Ryan Murphy's take on the Clinton impeachment has a bipartisan message about the corrupting nature of power.
Proving that claim requires more than reckless rhetoric, which is constitutionally protected.
NY Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie says impeachment is not possible once the Governor leaves office.
From Mitch McConnell's perspective, an independent commission can only mean trouble.
The book, which garnered a $4 million deal and touted Cuomo's purported pandemic-handling competence, may have gotten the governor into hot water.
Also: What we learned from impeachment.
A 2000 OLC memo suggests the answer is "yes."
The Senate minority leader's triangulation does not bode well for the GOP's ability to stand for something other than a personality cult.
Whether the reality-show-star-turned-first-president-to-be-impeached-twice has a future in American politics, however, sadly remains an open question.
The outcome shows that it is almost impossible to convict a president in an era of severe polarization. But Trump's second impeachment still served some useful purposes..
The 33-year-old lawmaker, who occupies Justin Amash's old seat, on how his party needs to reclaim the mantle of limited government, capitalism, and individualism.
He betrayed his oath and duties as president by hesitating to intervene and refusing to unambiguously condemn the violence.
Plus: Dems ask FDA to change abortion pill prescribing rule, Vice targets Clubhouse, and more...
He gets to the right answer, but botched the execution.
The 33-year-old successor to Justin Amash's House seat says his party has abandoned limited government, economic freedom, and individualism.
No amount of parsing can obscure his responsibility for the deadly attack on the Capitol.
The former President's attorneys repeatedly (mis)cite the work of Professor Brian Kalt on late impeachments.
He is on firmer ground in arguing that the Senate does not have the authority to try a former president, although that issue is highly contested.
The letter was signed by some 170 legal scholars across the political spectrum, including several VC bloggers.
The op ed, published today, explains why the First Amendment doesn't protect Trump against impeachment and conviction for his role in the attack on the Capitol.
Alas, the precedent for partisan votes on impeachment was set before Donald Trump.
Why Republican Senators can vote on the merits of Trump's impeachment even if they believe the Seante has no power to impeach ex-officers.
The Georgia representative has embraced nearly every crazy conspiracy theory that is popular on the right.
There are plausible arguments on both sides of the debate.
They also argue that the Senate has no authority to try a former president.
The House brief does a solid job of laying out the case against Trump. The defense brief is far less impressive.
While many prominent constitutional scholars think trying a former president is perfectly legal, the dissenters make some points that are worth considering.
On the validity of an impeachment trial for a former president.
The signers include a wide range of constitutional scholars across the political spectrum, including Federalist Society co-founder Steve Calabresi.
That punishment for reinforcing the delusions that drove the Capitol riot is highly unlikely, and it would set a troubling precedent.
The Senate minority leader sees a grave political risk in failing to repudiate the former president.
The First Amendment should not be a viable defense in an impeachment trial
A further rejoinder to Josh Blackman and Seth Tillman.
The Constitution's words, history, and structure suggest the best answer is no. He can't plead, "I beg my pardon."
The House and Senate are making unforced errors in laying the groundwork for an impeachment trial
Judge Michael Luttig thinks a former president cannot be tried in the Senate. The argument is flawed.
Trump has been impeached, but there is still time to put a stronger case before the Senate.
Conflicting signals from the Belknap impeachment